Realism and the Cyprus Issue: Is There Hope for a Solution?

In Cypriot politics, realism is often absent or misinterpreted, especially in relation to the Cyprus issue. The association of realism with the Turkish approach, starting with the statements of Rauf Denktash, has created a negative bias.

However, the Greek Cypriot side should prioritize realism, based on factual data rather than wishful thinking. Previous leaderships often failed to properly assess the international environment, leading to concessions.

This trend has also influenced civil society, creating an atmosphere of 'good neighborliness' that may consolidate the coexistence of separate entities. It has also affected mediators, underestimating the complexity of the problem.

Many approach the new leader of the Turkish Cypriot community, Tufan Erhürman, with wishful thinking, seeing in him a hope for the resumption of talks. They assume from the outset that his proposals will aim at resolving the Cyprus issue, without taking into account the potential influences of Turkey.

Today, a restart of the Cyprus issue based on factual data and realism is essential. This means recognizing that Turkish Cypriot leaders follow Ankara's instructions and that Turkey seeks to secure its interests on the island.

Erhürman's election should not lead to wishful thinking, but to a realistic assessment of the limits set by Turkish interests. It is time to see the world as it is.